While watching Seoul Ghost Stories on Netflix, I got bored and thought, Who am I? Where are we? As I was struck, I wondered what this was. I finally watched it to the end. I was wondering if there was a movie that had a novel impact among domestic horror movies, and then I came across a bestseller… * It reminded me of a 2010 movie called ^^ so I’ll post a review!! ^^
In the movie “The Devotion of Suspect A movie that gets more interesting the more you watch it – a bestseller! Let me introduce it to you. It is a movie in which actress Uhm Jung-hwa’s acting was outstanding, and this post is a review of the best-selling movie interpretation. Spoiler O, please keep that in mind. Then, let’s start the post about Uhm Jung-hwa’s best-selling movie analysis (Spoiler O) recovery post right now.
Best-selling director Lee Jeong-ho Starring Eom Jeong-hwa, Ryu Seung-ryong, Lee Do-kyung, Cho Jin-woong, Lee Seong-min, Kim Hwa-young, Park Ja-rang, Choi Moo-sung, Jo Hee-bong, Oh Jeong-se Released on April 15, 2010.
** There are a lot of spoilers.** After sequentially introducing the plot by numbering,** a review of the rice cake recovery analysis continues. Baek Hee-soo has reigned as Korea’s best-selling author for over 10 years. The movie begins with a man who is accused of plagiarizing a work he was in charge of as a judge of a contest for his newly published novel.
1. Popular author Baek Hee-soo’s bestseller is caught up in plagiarism suspicions. Baek Hee-soo, a writer who was on the rise as a best-selling author. She is accused of plagiarism because the concept of her bestseller is identical to the entry of a new author she judged. She strongly denies plagiarism, telling her husband, a university professor, that she has never read the submitted work. (cf: The movie was released in April 2010, recalling the “Zhou Yilan VS Gyeongran” incident that actually caused controversy in 2008. That’s right. The editor-in-chief’s line in the movie also says that the “East-West Literary Award” spot was left empty, and he was in disgrace for plagiarizing a work called “Tongue” by then-new writer Zhou Lan. This is a passage that overlaps with writer Gyeong-ran Cho, who won the Dongin Literary Award in 2008.)2. The editor-in-chief, who is Baek Hee-soo’s husband’s best friend, offers her a chance to make a comeback. Two years later, Baek Hee-soo drives away looking like a haggard old man. The editor-in-chief recommends Baek Hee-su to a villa where she can get really inspired, and suggests that she write a new bestseller there. A villa with a historic and special atmosphere, located in a quiet place in the countryside. Baek Hee-soo sees the photo and makes a decision. Let’s go! 3. Baek Hee-soo, who arrived at the rural village introduced by the editor-in-chief to work on her work, senses a strange village atmosphere. The village does not even know the name of ‘Baek Hee-su’, so they hang up a placard with the name ‘Park Hee-su’ and welcome her in an overly friendly manner. People seem to be hiding something. The villa we arrived at seemed somewhat eerie. 4. My daughter, who came with me, keeps talking to someone at the villa!? Strange things keep happening at the villa, and my daughter Yeonhee keeps talking to someone called “sister” in the attic of the villa. Baek Hee-soo, a mother who shows symptoms of nervousness toward her daughter and sometimes protects her daughter to the point of obsessiveness, is very anxious when her daughter Yeon-hee talks to someone. However, in the end, the story between her daughter and an unknown being called “sister” becomes the basis. , Baek Hee-soo is able to complete the work. Baek Hee-soo was hysterical due to the pain of creation. Finally, relying on the mystery of the gloomy villa, a masterpiece is completed. 5. The story I wrote at the villa was plagiarized again!? Baek Hee-soo returns to Seoul and makes a successful comeback. The novel she wrote at her villa was a huge hit. But again!! Her novel became embroiled in suspicions of plagiarism because it was identical to the novel “The End of Tragedy” published a long time ago. Baek Hee-soo was caught up in suspicions of plagiarism not once, but twice. She denies plagiarism even more strongly. “Yeonhee knows! “Yeonhee knows everything!!!” She says that her daughter Yeonhee knows that she did not plagiarize, but she screams and frantically claims her innocence. Every time that happens, both her husband and the editor-in-chief criticize her for belittling her daughter. 6. It could be unconscious plagiarism – you are not normal.Her husband is a professor who is knowledgeable about plagiarism, even giving a lecture in college on the topic of “unconscious plagiarism.” Her husband Young-jun, tired of telling her to “admit plagiarism,” eventually takes her to a psychiatric clinic. “Anyone can do it” and “anyone can do it unintentionally” – that’s why it’s so scary. Yeong-jun knows better than anyone that this is the swamp of “plagiarism” that people who create as a business can fall into, so he offers her treatment. I recommend 7. One small and “obvious” twist: What was revealed in the psychiatric clinic – I don’t have a daughter!! After the first plagiarism incident, that’s when I decided to divorce my husband. Baek Hee-soo took her daughter to a country villa to prove her creative world. But the truth is – there was no daughter. He was already dead, the psychiatrist exclaims. “Your daughter is dead! “She’s already dead!!!” Yeon-hee died after being electrocuted by a hair dryer while playing alone in the bathtub due to her mother’s obsessive-compulsive behavior, which was sensitive under the pressure of creativity. However, she pretended that her daughter was alive and acted as if her daughter was by her side the whole time. .In the end, Baek Hee-soo admits her daughter’s death and weeps due to the stress of creating and the trauma of her daughter.8. My story is true! I have never read “The End of a Tragedy”!!She sets out to find the author of “The End of a Tragedy.” ‘I’ve never read that book, so how can the book I wrote be the same without a single mistake in the ending??’ Baek Hee-soo, who decided to find out for herself what happened, meets the author of “The End of Tragedy”. Surprisingly, the author was also in the village when her mother died and stayed at the same villa where Baek Hee-soo wrote the novel. You will find out. And one more thing. Surprisingly, Baek Hee-su heard that the author of “The End of Tragedy” also wrote the book while staying with his dead mother in that villa in that village!!9. There’s something in that house! A secret hidden in the house! What is the full story of the murder case? She heads to the country villa right away. She really needed to get rid of the stigma of being a plagiarist writer.There is something in that house!!!!I will prove that my story is true and that I wrote the book based on a story I found out in this house.All the keys. Choi Soo-jin’s elderly mother, who appears to have been killed in this village 22 years ago, is hit by a car and dies at a critical moment. Uncovering the truth seemed to be a difficult task, but she soon pieced together the puzzle of the incident 22 years ago based on the evidence discovered at the country villa. 10. Two small, “obvious” twists: The formula is that the culprit is a surprisingly nice and dull person. The outline of the incident from 22 years ago is revealed. (The mysterious murder case, which can be inferred from the circumstances that she told her story to every novelist who came to the villa as if she wanted to reveal her injustice – the outline of the case of Choi Soo-jin, the girl who died unjustly, is finally revealed.) This case. The culprits were not four old men who looked somewhat sinister, but four young men from the village. One of them was the kind and honest youth leader who always showed Baek Hee-soo a shockingly innocent side, and the other three also came to Baek Hee-soo in a dark room to get rid of the body they had hidden in the villa for fear that their crimes would be discovered in the aftermath of the novel. We gather at the same country villa where we stayed. 11. The villagers treat Baek Hee-su cold when he returns and try to send him back to Seoul, but the village, which has been highlighted as the setting for a brutal murder case due to Baek Hee-su’s novel, is in a chaotic mood. The village adults treat Baek Hee-su harshly when she returns to the village and try to drive her away to Seoul. In particular, the police station chief was very favorable to her because he had high expectations of making this place famous as the setting for a novel. Even the police station chief, who supported Baek Hee-soo while ignoring the local people’s opinions about making the village famous as a fishing spot, He turns his back on her and tells her to go to Seoul. 12. Baek Hee-soo is hiding in the villa again! Three of the four criminals enter the villa! But Baek Hee-su refuses to leave the village despite the villagers’ urging. Then, he secretly sneaks into the villa, and Baek Hee-soo witnesses the operation to collect the bodies of the three criminals who came from Seoul (the remaining three excluding the youth leader)! But somehow, there is no place in the attic in the corner of the villa where Choi Soo-jin was buried 22 years ago. There was no body to deal with! 13. After many twists and turns, the four people gather together, and Baek Hee-su discovers their existence. He looks around sensitively due to the memory of the murder 22 years ago. Baek Hee-soo’s existence is eventually discovered by the three criminals who were watching her. The person she encountered while running away was the youth leader. Baek Hee-soo (who did not yet know that the youth leader was the culprit as the play unfolds) asks him for help, but he is no longer an ally. 14. A husband worried about his uncommunicative wife comes to the country villa. At that time, Baek Hee-soo’s husband , Youngjun decides to go looking for his wife after being unable to contact her. The voice recorder at my wife’s house, what is this? Baek Hee-soo turns on the voice recorder that she used when working at the villa, puts it to her ear, and immediately leaves for the villa. Even if everyone says they don’t trust her, I think I should trust her. Baek Hee-soo is writing a novel. When I was staying at the villa to write, Baek Hee-soo played the voice recorder whenever I sat across from the dining table with my (non-existent) daughter Yeon-hee. What was the sound Youngjun heard? 15. Baek Hee-soo is caught and tied up by four criminals. The youth leader’s stupid foolishness and remorse mixed with madness, their subsequent reminiscences, the truth being revealed, the four criminals blame each other for the incident 22 years ago, releasing their guilt and fear into violence, and their own melee. It happens. At that time, Youngjun arrives at the villa. The youth leader beats up Youngjun. Baek Hee-su tries hard to untie the rope that bound her. They try to save Yeong-jun, but it’s not enough. A chase and chase continues between those who try to cover up the truth and those who try to dig up the truth. 16. The last of the criminals all meet a bad end in the end. Either die or be bad. And Baek Hee-soo, who survived his death. The youth leader, Baek Hee-su, is pushed by a truck in reverse and dies in the same manner as Choi Soo-jin was killed 22 years ago. 17. Three small and “obvious” twists: The true culprit is the police station chief, and the appearance of the final villain!! The father of the youth leader. This is the head of the police station, a powerful figure in this town. He did not hesitate to do ugly things to cover up his son’s crimes all those years ago, and he is the one who got rid of the body to eliminate evidence of the crime. Since he was the head of the police station, he can be said to be the true villain of the Choi Soo-jin case. The head of the police station is now heading to the villa. I previously told Baek Hee-soo not to set foot in this village, but I have my doubts as to whether the writer has definitely gone to Seoul. There is still no news from the son who said he was coming to look around the villa, and I have an ominous feeling about it so I go to the villa myself. I turned around and saw my dead son and a scared Baek Hee-su in the villa. Her husband, Youngjun, is lying unconscious. The police station chief aims his gun at Baek Hee-su. And the shell casing flies towards Baek Hee-su. 18. Baek Hee-soo shoots the police station chief!! Baek Hee-soo gets shot. The police station chief puts her on a boat and takes her out to the river. As he rows, he recites as if confessing his situation, knowing all about the incident 22 years ago. He also threw his son’s body into the river to hide his crime. The reason he opposed the development of the village as a fishing spot was because Choi Soo-jin’s body was buried under the river. “Why do you get so angry when you tell him to go to Seoul?” He said Baek Hee-su was also thrown into the river for the crime of knowing the truth. I leave it out. As Baek Hee-su struggles, the police station chief’s gun falls into the water, and in the water, Baek Hee-su encounters the remains of Choi Su-jin, who remains as a skeleton. She seems to have made up her mind and aims her gun in the water at the boat on the surface. Surprisingly, the bullet he fired with all his might hit the mark. The police station chief fell down after being shot on his stomach. It is the moment when the police station chief is dying. 19. The husband comes to his senses and saves his wife. The husband, Young-jun, comes to his senses just in time and goes to the riverside where the sound of gunshots are heard and rescues Baek Hee-su, who had been shot and had fallen into the water. Early the next morning, the couple watched in silence as 119 rescue workers and police officers sorted out the incident. Now I look back and think it’s over… The screen switches. 20. Before attending the committee – Editor-in-Chief, Youngjun, and Baek Hee-su gather to chat. Rest area in the hallway of the committee building.” Ah, you foolish Gomtings, no matter how much you get caught up in the plagiarism controversy. Did you really have to do this? “These are the editor-in-chief’s first words as he approaches Youngjun and Baek Hee-su, holding three cups of take-out coffee. The editor-in-chief leaves, leaving Youngjun and Baek Hee-su. “Are you okay?? “When Young-jun asks, Baek Hee-soo replies, “What I wrote after listening to Soo-jin’s story is also plagiarism.” 21.Ending – Baek Hee-su goes to the committee and admits plagiarism, and Baek Hee-su’s ‘strange’ smile while driving… *At the committee meeting, Baek Hee-soo admits to plagiarism regarding suspicions that she copied a new writer’s entry. It is true that I read the work of the new writer in question when I was judging, and although it was not my intention, I also agree that the concept is similar. Baek Hee-soo shows his cool side by saying that he admits to plagiarism because he doesn’t want to ruin the dreams and future of a new writer. I leave the committee with the message that I will leave it to you to decide whether there is plagiarism or not. In a confident and comfortable manner. And at the beginning of Yeongho, it switches to the same scene as when Baek Hee-soo was heading to a country villa, dreaming of making a comeback. Baek Hee-soo is driving with the look of a haggard old man. He is holding the steering wheel, looking at the car’s rear-view mirror and frowning, smiling a subtle and unpleasant smile. The movie ends with her expression throwing a smile.
This is the entire plot. From number 1 to number 21, I wrote down the sequential flow shown in the movie. ★From now on, we will take a look at the hidden twist and meaning of the movie!!-*★
In my opinion, the real plot of this movie is – No. 1 -> No. 21 -> No. 2 ~ 20 (imagination + next novel). In other words, you only committed plagiarism once. And the twist is that the story in the villa is all imagination or will be included in the next novel… *After this puzzle was put together, I thought that it would be a waste of a movie to just be dismissed as a sloppy second half brawl. Is this a movie worth thinking about? I thought the narrative trick was really fun. If I rearrange this movie. Numbers 2 to 20, this part is Baek Hee-soo’s imagination and will become the content of her bestseller (aiming for a comeback) to be published in the future. Baek Hee-soo’s final smile was a moment that also reminded me of the cartoon “Perfect Blue.” Number 1 -> Number 21 -> Let me summarize why I thought it was number 2 to number 20, the real twist of this movie, and what this movie really wants to say~~
ㅇ Reason for thinking No. 1 -> No. 21 -> ‘No. 2 ~ 20’ 1) Bathroom tiles!!
The reason why the bathroom tiles of the country villa that Baek Hee-soo visited are the same as the bathroom tiles of Baek Hee-su’s Seoul home. What is it? It’s probably not to save production costs. Those tiles have flashy patterns and colors!! It definitely captures the audience’s attention. Baek Hee-soo has a strong trauma about bathrooms. The trauma of the ‘water’ in which the ‘daughter’ died is also strong. She cannot be free from that trauma. This is why the bathroom tiles in her Seoul home are clearly imprinted in her mind. So the bathroom of her imagined villa had no choice but to be expressed with the same tiles she remembered. Sadly. 2) No explanation for the second plagiarism suspicion.
This is one of the most important reasons. If the story that unfolded in numbers 2 to 19, which took place in a rural village, is true to the real life experience of Baek Hee-soo, then the topic of plagiarism to be revealed by the committee would have been the second suspicion of plagiarism. The first plagiarism was already buried after controversy about three years ago, and the next novel was successful, and the novel was embroiled in a second plagiarism controversy, forcing Baek Hee-soo to return to the villa. If the committee were to dig into the truth of the incident and come back and continue immediately, There should have been an explanation for the second plagiarism connected to this incident, but the plagiarism suspicion discussed by the committee was about the first plagiarism dispute. This is because the series of events that flow from numbers 2 to 19 never existed in the first place. Sequence 20 (coffee time before entering the committee) can be seen as half imaginary and half real. What the editor-in-chief said in sequence 20 , “Oh, you foolish gomtings, no matter how much you get caught up in the plagiarism controversy, did you really have to do it this way??” If you look at the very line, it is not a worry for those who went back to the country villa after an eventful night to find evidence, but they decided to go to the committee, pretend to be cool, admit to plagiarism, and settle the situation with an upright and honest conscience. It was a concern. Is it really necessary to attack it head on like this? I want to. And like the actual ending number 21, Baek Hee-soo would have admitted to the first suspicion of plagiarism (the only plagiarism that actually occurred) and gone to hell. Anyway, it would have been necessary to express one’s position through the next novel, such as self-justification or redefinition of this situation, and I think the next novel in Baek Hee-su’s head would have unfolded from the contents of numbers 2 to 20.
3) Baek Hee-su’s trauma
I would also like to point out that stories 2 to 20 fit perfectly with Baek Hee-soo’s trauma. Since this imaginary story is a creation that reflects Baek Hee-soo’s imagination, it does not escape Baek Hee-soo’s trauma. The guilt of not being able to protect her daughter, or rather, the immense guilt of not being able to protect her, but of having her daughter die due to her desire for creativity, is weighing on Baek Hee-su. Is it because of that trauma?
Stories from 2 to 20, the central axis is the daughter of someone who died unjustly. Choi Soo-jin, who died unjustly, and her mother becomes a crazy old mother who still believes that her daughter is alive. Baek Hee-su carries all the crosses herself and shows courage. It shows that the truth is clearly being uncovered. Choi Soo-jin, who died unjustly, is persistently angry at the criminals as if they were her own daughter, and her anger goes beyond the justification of digging into the truth of the case to explain the accusation of her plagiarism. Another interesting point is that, unlike Baek Hee-soo in reality, who was criticized as a writer who lost her morals due to the plagiarism controversy, in her imagination, she is portrayed as a righteous woman with minimal morality who seeks to reveal the truth. And the fact that the place where Choi Soo-jin’s remains are – that is, the place where she last breathed her last breath – is in the river, reflects her trauma.
Also, to be honest, the settings in the story from numbers 2 to 20 are too obvious and too obvious, not to mention a twist, right? But why did they write the story like this? If you think about it, yes… Her imagination, as a story in itself, is of such quality… That’s because it wasn’t that important in the first place. The daughter was already dead, the youth leader was the culprit, the police station chief was a total villain, and yes, I have to dig up the truth! It doesn’t seem like this was a movie made to be a twist. Baek Hee-soo’s trauma. By focusing on the link connected to the story, foreshadowing, allusions, and hints that contain the fact that this story is her imagination are scattered and retrieved like rice cakes, and in the end, the film captures the reality of her trauma and uses narrative tricks. I think the biggest twist in this movie is that it deceived the audience.
4) Hidden hints in other lines
① When Baek Hee-soo was caught in a plagiarism dispute for the second time after publishing a novel based on a murder case in the village, he returned to the village saying he would uncover the truth. At that time, the head of the police station and the people in the surrounding neighborhood are desperate to chase Baek Hee-soo back to Seoul. Meanwhile, if you look at the conversation between the people in the neighborhood, there is a scene where they say, “Did that writer really go back to Seoul?” At that time, the police box What Jang says is impressive. ” There is a line that says, ‘I must have gone back to Seoul~ I’m probably taking a bath and soaking in the bath water right now~’, and there are several scenes where Baek Hee-soo takes a bath and soaks in the bath water to relieve stress when something is not going well. It came up once, right? Am I the only one who thinks that the police station chief can say this because he is a character created in the mind of writer Baek Hee-soo?
② As expected, it’s a trivial line. Baek Hee-soo’s husband, Young-jun, says this to the editor-in-chief when he sees another plagiarism storm after his wife’s novel about a village murder became a huge hit.” If I had the writing skills of a countess, I could have written it like a completely different novel from a different perspective. “In scene 20, before entering the committee, Baek Hee-soo also says the following to her husband. “Next time, I will write a completely different novel with the same story but from a different perspective. This time it will be a story between a mother and daughter. “The lines are exquisite. (This line will be discussed further below in the section on plagiarism by Baek Hee-soo.)
ㅇ To sum up the real twist of this movie -*① The second plagiarism does not exist, ② The flow from 1st -> 21st -> 2nd to 20th is the actual flow of this movie, ③ A series of events that occurred in a rural village. The real twist of this movie is that the story is all Baek Hee-soo’s imagination and the contents of the next novel are mixed together. Let’s go into more detail about it. I will do it.
1) Strictly speaking, what Sujin wrote after hearing the story was plagiarism. The reason why I thought it was ㅇ No. 1 -> No. 21 -> ‘No. 2 ~ 20’ written earlier 2) This may be slightly related to the lack of explanation for the second suspicion of plagiarism. I guess so. What the committee is explaining is the part about the first novel that appears in the play. And before joining the committee, Baek Hee-soo says, “Strictly speaking, what I wrote after listening to Su-jin’s story is plagiarism.” No, the novel that Sujin wrote after hearing from a ghost is her second novel, right? Strange, right? Flow? “Why is the ending of the novel ‘The End of Tragedy’ published a long time ago and the latest hit novel the same?” If you were to answer the question, this would be appropriate. It’s strange that a committee is suddenly being held for the first time in several years to judge a contest for new writers and have to answer whether or not the original work was copied, and it’s also strange that Sujin suddenly speaks. “It’s plagiarism.” Why on earth did this statement come out? As mentioned earlier, I think the content of number 20 is half Baek Hee-soo’s reality and half Baek Hee-soo’s imagination. In reality, both the editor-in-chief and her husband would have been as worried about Baek Hee-soo as in number 20. Official recognition and silence about controversy are two different things. Perhaps in real life, Baek Hee-su lost her daughter, divorced her husband, and became mentally ill, and needed something to turn it all around. “Writing after listening to Sujin’s story is also plagiarism” has great implications in that sense. As we look at Baek Hee-su in stories 2 to 19, we think that writing a novel after listening to the ghost Sujin’s words is plagiarism. Did you do it? Usually, you wouldn’t have done it. Many people may have thought that it would be unfair to write a novel based on what a ghost told them. That’s what Baek Hee-soo wanted to say through her next novel. “I reviewed it and read it, and unconsciously it stayed in my memory and the concept was the same. Strictly speaking, that’s plagiarism.” I guess I wanted to say that I am not an established writer who is shameless and has no concept of stealing young manuscripts. Rather, he probably wanted to express through his next novel that he admitted to plagiarism because his conscience was too noble and he was too cruel to himself. The line in which he defends his true feelings by replacing reality with the novel is, “What I wrote after listening to Soo-jin’s story is also plagiarism.” And in the novel, he goes to the committee and (in the context of the movie) appears to acknowledge the suspicion of plagiarism regarding the second novel and people. He may have dreamed of becoming a writer who was evaluated as humble by others. In reality, after acknowledging number 21, that is, the first plagiarism (actually the only plagiarism), Baek Hee-su’s reality was that, unlike his cool appearance in the committee, the writer’s life could end. There will be It must have been a bit of a blow and criticism.
2) Soo-jin & Yeon-hee The reason why I thought it was ㅇ number 1 -> number 21 -> ‘number 2 ~ 20’ written earlier 4) Among the hidden hints in other lines, it is connected to ②. In sequence number 20, Baek Hee-soo is a member of the committee. Just before entering. Do you remember the line you say to your husband, Youngjun? “Next time, I will write a completely different novel with the same story but from a different perspective. This time it will be a story between a mother and daughter. “I will write a story that will feature my daughter, you, and everyone else. Baek Hee-soo, her life as a writer is a life she traded for her daughter’s death. I can’t even imagine how much of an absolute trauma her daughter will be to her. Yeon-hee, who exists in stories 2 to 19, is the dead daughter, but in fact, since the content itself is a novel and Baek Hee-soo’s imagination, not only Yeon-hee but also Su-jin will be the daughter transformed within Baek Hee-soo. Yeon-hee believes that she is like that in reality. The image of the daughter who was sent away would have been projected, and Sujin’s feelings for the daughter she could not protect in reality were also projected, and the main character in the novel (who imitates herself) is trying to relieve Sujin’s injustice in some way (like a mother). The main character) would have been established. In other words, Su-jin and Su-jin’s mother, the characters created in Baek Hee-soo’s head, and their stories feel somehow connected to the stories of Baek Hee-soo’s mother and daughter. A mother who could not protect her daughter, a mother who sent her daughter away first, and Baek Hee-soo’s inner self, who projects herself into the tragedy and projects herself again as a savior who relieves the mother and daughter’s resentment, are revealed as they are in this novel. .
3) Are you saying that Baek Hee-soo plagiarized? Are you saying you didn’t do it? First of all, if you simply look at the stories from 2 to 19, you can see that Baek Hee-soo is not a plagiarist writer. In any case, it is clear that she has not read the work ‘The End of Tragedy’. And based on a true story, Jae-gi It is also clear that he has written another successful bestseller. Looking at stories 2 through 19, it is clear that he is not only a poor creator with a nervous breakdown who fell victim to the pain of creation, but at least an immoral and unscrupulous creator. She is not a plagiarizing writer. I think she chose the characters and story of the sequel in that way to make people think that she is not a plagiarizing writer. When people look at the book, they think twice from the perspective of a writer who has been caught up in suspicions of plagiarism. There must be room for it. So, is she really a plagiarist writer in real life? In other words, the first suspicion of plagiarism in the movie: Did she plagiarize or not? Husband Young-jun says to his wife Baek Hee-su, “If I had the writing skills of a count family, I could have written it like a completely different novel from a different perspective.” ” Do you remember this line? The reason why I thought it was ㅇ number 1 -> number 21 -> ‘number 2 ~ 20’ 4) Among the hidden hints in the other lines, it is connected to ②. This is the content that is connected to ②. This is probably what Youngjun wants to hear, and his own internal response to the plagiarism accusation against him. If I intentionally plagiarized, would you copy it so blatantly if I didn’t get caught with my writing skills? In other words, it’s unfair. About unconscious plagiarism. It’s unconscious plagiarism that I can’t control. Due to the writer’s habit of instinctively putting everything he sees in his head, the manuscript of a new writer would have been like that as well. First of all, the fact is that the concept is the same. The fact that I reviewed that person’s work. Baek Hee-soo, who could not be free from this fact, would have said, “I admit it, even though I didn’t mean to,” and would have wanted to say his innocence through a follow-up, that is, by doing what he does best. Just as he said, “I will leave it up to you to decide whether or not to plagiarize,” he wanted to influence readers’ judgment of his previous work through his follow-up work, and 2 is a Baek Hee-style psychological thriller that mixes that mental illness with the writer’s imagination. The story unfolded from number 1 to number 20.
4) The meaning of the final treatment of Baek Hee-su’s gaze. Now that I have written all I can say ^^;; Looking at what I’ve released so far, I think it’s right to laugh like that at the end ^^;; What do you think of the novels I’ve written so far? Were you fooled too? I will write my next novel and make a comeback like this. I will mix everything inside me and say it through my novel and my writing. What kind of person am I? If you read this novel, you will be on my side again, right??ㅇ What I really want to say about this movie & overall review
Even if she did plagiarize, we want to take her side. This is a movie that shows us how the pain of creation devastates a person’s soul. The depth of this film is felt in that it shows a three-dimensional and multifaceted view of plagiarism by twisting the perspective that has so far seen plagiarists as ‘strong men of absolute evil’ and those who have been plagiarized as ‘weak men of absolute good’. This film is a film that expresses the ‘pain of creation’ and ‘desire for creation’ with the code of “plagiarism”, and I think it is a very novel film that approaches the expression in a fresh way through horror. Rather than intending to scare people with an obvious ghost game, the tension brought by the theme of ‘plagiarism’ and the fear that stirs within the creator are transformed into a thriller genre, expressing the psychological trauma and pain felt by a person in quite a deep way. I thought that the idea of the movie was very good in terms of context, and I also thought that the ‘unconscious plagiarism’ that Baek Hee-soo’s husband, Young-jun, explained during his lecture in the movie was in line with the overall context of the movie. I think it’s an impactful movie, with both the characters and story ideas, as I was able to fully understand the topic of ‘plagiarism’ and the fate of the creator while watching the movie. In particular, I like movies that make good use of narrative tricks (a narrative technique that deliberately misleads the reader with information through intentionally biased narratives), and this movie is full of that narrative trick that explodes at the end (Committee). Thumbs up. This is a movie I would especially like to praise highly because it gave me the amazing experience of watching a puzzle without thinking about it and then suddenly, like crazy, putting the puzzle together.
I really didn’t start with the intention of analyzing it in such detail ^^;; It got really, really long as I was writing it ^^ I think it was a work with a really good idea, to the point where there was a lot to write about, and I think the part where it included a narrative trick was a clever twist. However, the content of the novel in the movie is still a little less… What if it had been obvious? It’s a shame that this good idea seems to have been made in a clumsy and rough way. There are parts that feel crude, so it would have been a great work if this good idea had been crafted more smoothly and presented. It is a work that leaves some regrets. However, the idea of this movie, which was completed by combining the inner psychology of the protagonist, who can feel the creator’s agony, with the horror genre and weaving it into a thriller-like structure, and adding a narrative trick to it, was very well done. It’s a work of art. I also felt new today when they caught me and posted something like this regarding rice cake collection haha.
And above all else, the best actress, Uhm Jeong-hwa. “I truly respect the acting skills of Uhm Jung-hwa, who has the ability to kill two birds with one stone as a singer and an actor, and achieves this difficult and uncommon path!!” It was a movie where you could feel the charm of actress Uhm Jung-hwa, whose impactful performance in “Princess Aurora” was also felt in the best-seller movie. Well then, while recommending the bestseller movie -* haha Uhm Jung-hwa’s bestseller movie interpretation review (spoiler O) Retrieval of Rice Cake (feat narrative trick) I will end here **Photo source: Naver Photo /